
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 9a Page 5 of 8
Meeting Date: October 13, 2026
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Add Port staff to perform these functions. This option would eliminate the need
for a contract to provide guard services at Employee Parking facilities and task the Port of Seattle
and SEA with responsibility for all site-security services.
Cost Implications: Further analysis estimates the five-year cost to transition security services to
Port employees is approximately $12.1M, compared to $6.9M for contracted security services
over the same period. This estimate is based on a blended rate of current airport security
positions and includes wages and benefits required for a minimum staffing model of 15 full-time
employees (FTE) which satisfy three required security posts for 24-hour, 7-days a week, and 365-
days coverage.
This estimate also includes incremental corporate overhead and other non-payroll operating
expenses associated with supporting the additional FTEs, such as uniforms, equipment, fuel,
training, and recruitment. These costs would go to annual expenses and are significant. The
estimate, however, does not include collective bargaining-related costs or negotiated wage
adjustments.
For 2027 alone, the Port staffing model is estimated at approximately $2.2M, consisting of
$2.13M in wages and benefits, $27,600 in corporate overhead, and $71,783 in other non-payroll
related expenses. The five-year forecast assumes an annual payroll and corporate overhead
escalation rate of 5.5%, as provided by F&B; and 1% annual escalation of recurring non-payroll
expenses beginning in 2028. Based on these assumptions, the Port staffing model is
approximately $5.97M greater—almost double—than the five-year contracted security proposal.
Pros:
(1) Port staff are more knowledgeable of Port policies and procedures and Employee
Parking procedures and could answer questions and provide improved customer service
to Employee Lot customers.
Cons:
(1) Disruptive to business operations. New staff would be needed to perform this new
role, and many lines of business have difficulty filling existing positions. Staff is
concerned that business continuity and site security may suffer from a lack of
headcount or the inability to find qualified personnel.
(2) Increase supervisory work. Maintaining a 24/7 coverage program requires additional
supervisory work to handle real-time call outs and staffing shortages. Creating this
program will add to recruiting, training, development, and supervisory programs.
(3) Increase operational expenses. The Port will accept responsibility for any equipment
required by the new employees.