
Alternatives Analysis
Self-Perform Alternative Contract with 3
rd
Party Vendor
Estimated Wages, Benefits & OH $9.2M $6 M
4
Alt #2: Self-Perform/In-house Alt #3: Contract with 3
rd
Party
Pros
• Internal management control over staff
performance and customer service standards
• Immediate and direct alignment with Port
priorities
Cons
• Substantive administrative burden on existing
operation, impacts on current staffing levels
• Potential new investments in staffing support
systems (dispatch and supervision)
• Increased expenditures compared to Alt #3
• Less flexibility with scaling staff levels, seasonality
• Potential impact to CFC funds
Pros
• Compatible with budget expenditures, forecast
CFC estimates and planned capital improvements
• Flexibility to change staffing levels swiftly with
seasonal variability
• Maintains consistent service standards and
accountability across all locations
Cons
• Transitioning to a new vendor can require
familiarization, vendor training, etc.
• Less direct control over staff performance and
customer service standards compared to Alt #2