
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 10b Page 3 of 5
Meeting Date: May 26, 2026
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 –
Build the full Main Terminal Improvement Program. This includes emergency power, a fully
pressurized smoke control system, new sprinklers and rework of existing, and a comprehensive
architectural renovation including ceiling, lighting and wall and floor renovations.
Cost Implications: $1.3-$1.5B
Pros:
(1) Increase infrastructure capacity and have an architecturally refreshed Main Terminal.
Cons:
(1) High cost.
(2) Large impacts on customer service and operations within the Main Terminal.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Build out the emergency power, smoke control and fire sprinkler systems only, in
the Main Terminal.
Cost Implications: $600-800M
Pros:
(1) This alternative would provide emergency power and a fully functioning, pressurized
smoke control system in the Main Terminal, as well as sprinkler updates and provide
limited architecture updates to accommodate the new work (ceiling, lights, some
signage, etc.)
Cons:
(1) This strategy has extensive ancillary construction work that balloons the project cost.
For example, by removing the ceiling for the sprinklers and smoke control, the project
would be required to fully abate the structural deck and systems. The project would not
be able to re-use the old ceiling, so a new one would be required. This alternative would
also require new lighting, security cameras and signage.
(2) The cost exceeds budget capacity.
(3) Construction is highly impactful to customer service and operations.
This is not the recommended alternative.