
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8f Page 3 of 4
Meeting Date: October 14, 2025
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Do nothing.
Cost Implications: No additional funds committed.
Pros:
(1) Reduced cost to the Port.
Cons:
(1) T18 Maintenance Dredging Project will not be fully completed and the lease obligations
to the Tenant cannot be fulfilled.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Fully fund the ERL portion of the T18 Maintenance Dredging Project.
Cost Implications: Additional funding of $1,000,000 to the project.
Pros:
(1) Complete the project according to the full committed scope of the T18 Maintenance
Dredging Project.
(2) Protects the environment from potential contamination at T18.
Cons:
(1) Additional funding of $1,000,000 is required.
This is the recommended alternative.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Project Cost Details - NWSA
This Request Total Project Cost Cost to Date Remaining Cost
Procurement $0 $0 $0 $0
Pre-Design $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0
Design $0 $900,000 $450,000 $450,000
Construction $0 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
Total $0 $3,000,000 $550,000 $2,450,000
Project Cost Details – POS ERL
This Request Total Project Cost Cost to Date Remaining Cost
Procurement $0 $0 $0 $0
Pre-Design $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
Total $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000