
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8i Page 3 of 5
Meeting Date: August 12, 2025
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
(2) May not fully meet the demands associated with increased staffing levels, potentially
leading to operational inefficiencies or vehicle sharing.
(3) With fewer vehicles acquired, the potential environmental benefits from fleet
electrification and fuel efficiency are reduced.
(4) Delaying full acquisition may result in higher future costs due to inflation, supply chain
constraints, or vehicle price increases.
(5) Fewer vehicles may result in uneven distribution of task-appropriate or specialized
equipment across units.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Authorize the budget and acquisition of 16 police vehicles to replace assets that
have reached the end of their useful life.
Cost Implications: $1,364,690 spend on capital equipment replacement.
Pros:
(1) Replaces aging vehicles with newer, more reliable assets, reducing maintenance costs
and improving fleet performance.
(2) Enhances safety and efficiency by upgrading to vehicles with modern technologies and
improved fuel economy.
(3) Supports continuity of operations by ensuring mission-critical vehicles are dependable
and properly equipped.
(4) Advances sustainability goals through the opportunity to replace outdated vehicles with
up to twelve hybrid and four EV models.
(5) Avoids escalating repair costs and downtime often associated with end-of-life fleet
assets.
Cons:
(1) Does not expand the fleet to meet growing staffing levels or provide support for the newly
established HSU unit.
(2) Limits the Port’s ability to respond to increased operational demand, potentially
impacting service levels.
(3) Missed opportunity to evaluate EV integration in new operational areas, as focus remains
on replacement only.
(4) May require short-term vehicle sharing or leasing to fill gaps created by new positions
without fleet expansion.
(5) Does not fully align with strategic growth goals, as it focuses solely on asset replacement
rather than future capacity needs.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 3 – Authorize the acquisition of 29 police vehicles to replace 16 assets that have
reached the end of their useful life and procure 13 additional vehicles to support increased FTEs
and the newly created HSU unit.