Template revised April 12, 2018.
COMMISSION
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Item No. 11b
BRIEFING ITEM Date of Meeting April 22, 2025
DATE: March 7, 2025
TO: Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director
FROM: Sandra Kilroy, Senior Director, Environment & Sustainability
Sarah Ogier, Director, Maritime Environment & Sustainability
David Fujimoto, Sr. Environmental Program Manager
SUBJECT: Seattle Waterfront Clean Energy Strategy Briefing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Seattle Waterfront Clean Energy Strategy (SWCES) is a first-of-its-kind collaboration between
the Port of Seattle (Port), Northwest Seaport Alliance (NWSA), and Seattle City Light (SCL) to
assess the power infrastructure investments and strategies needed to support the electrification
of buildings, vehicles, vessels, and equipment on Port-owned properties. Electrification is a
primary strategy for achieving the Port’s climate and clean air goals as outlined in the Maritime
Climate and Clean Air Action Plan (MCAAP), Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy (NWPCAS), and
Century Agenda.
The SWCES delivers technical, policy, and planning recommendations for how the Port and its
partners should plan and implement the infrastructure needed to support a zero-emission
maritime transition in Seattle by 2050. In 2021, the Port, NWSA and SCL entered a 10-year
partnering agreement to support the joint planning and implementation of clean energy
infrastructure, including development of the SWCES. This briefing provides an overview of the
recently completed SWCES, recommendations, and next steps.
BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT
In the Pacific Northwest (PNW), access to affordable, low-carbon electricity is a key advantage to
the electrification of buildings, vehicles, vessels and equipment. Electrification using the PNW’s
clean power can also significantly reduce air pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Through the NWPCAS, the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma and NWSA adopted a shared vision to
phase out seaport-related emissions by 2050. In 2021 and 2023 respectively, the Port of Seattle
and NWSA accelerated goals for their own port-controlled operations, aiming to reach net zero
greenhouse gas emissions by 2040. The City of Seattle similarly established targets essential to
meeting global climate commitments, aiming to achieve carbon neutrality city-wide by 2050.
Through the NWPCAS, infrastructure needed to support zero emissions equipment is identified
as a central objective on the path to adoption of zero-emission operations across Northwest
COMMISSION AGENDA – Briefing Item No. 11b Page 2 of 7
Meeting Date: April 22, 2025
Template revised September 22, 2016.
ports. Across the Seattle harbor, several thousand vehicles (including heavy-duty trucks,
motorcoaches, ground transportation, and fleet vehicles), hundreds of pieces of equipment
(including cargo handling and construction equipment), hundreds of vessel calls (including ocean-
going and harbor vessels) and dozens of buildings demand a mix of energy sources,
predominantly petroleum-based liquid fuels and natural gas. Together, these fossil fuels
comprise approximately 78% of total onsite energy use. However, Seattle and the region are
preparing for a significant transition to lower emission fuel sources.
As the ports and their tenants transition to electrified options, the Port’s infrastructure will need
to be prepared to handle the additional electrical loads. The SWCES is specifically designed to
address this need by bringing together industry and utility interests, analyzing current and
projected power requirements, and providing a roadmap for the development of energy
infrastructure.
PARTNERING AGREEMENT WITH SCL AND NWSA
Authorized in October of 2021, the Port, NWSA and SCL entered into a 10-year agreement to
support the participation in and achievement of common goals around the SWCES. These
include:
Planning jointly for the provision of clean energy, including the inventory, forecast,
analysis, and identification of coordinated actions.
Working together through a designated representative from each organization to manage
the Strategy and establish a collaborative and communicative platform for identifying and
assessing alternatives, developing solutions, reaching decisions, and resolving disputes.
Developing measures so that the Strategy development, capital planning, and delivery
processes run smoothly and without surprises to any other Party.
Coordinating related studies, plans, and projects, and sharing information, inputs, and
outputs to facilitate the integration of the SWCES within broader objectives of each of the
Parties.
Employing a holistic, integrated planning approach that addresses multiple sites, near
term as well as planned demands, co-optimized infrastructure and end use investments,
traditional infrastructure and non-wires solutions, and multi-party benefits and
considerations (such as the utility, port, tenant, community, and industry).
Evaluating and pursuing innovative solutions for clean energy deployment including
infrastructure planning, delivery, operational procedures, policies, financing, and
business models.
Establishing a framework for and supporting ongoing coordination and implementation
across the Parties.
Coordinating communications and stakeholder engagement activities.
Developing shared funding strategies to support and leverage clean energy investments.
COMMISSION AGENDA – Briefing Item No. 11b Page 3 of 7
Meeting Date: April 22, 2025
Template revised September 22, 2016.
PLANNING PROCESS
The SWCES was developed through an analytical process that considered Port-owned maritime
properties along Seattle’s Elliott Bay, the Duwamish River, the Lake Washington Ship Canal, and
Shilshole Bay. This analysis included sites managed by the Maritime Division and NWSA and
operated by the Port and private terminal operators. Large loads from adjacent properties were
also considered. Interviews were conducted with the ports’ lines of business and maritime
industry tenants to provide insights into energy uses and operational requirements. A summary
of the SWCES development process is outlined below:
The SWCES analysis began with a site-by-site baseline analysis of 24 locations, at which, site
operations, equipment, emissions, and fuel and energy uses were evaluated. This baseline
provided a foundation for further investigation of a subset of 11 priority sites with high load
growth potential, four locations expected to have significant, unique “spot loads,” three potential
truck charging locations, and four near-port sites selected by the utility.
Forecasts of power demand were then developed to project peak power requirements through
2050. This forecast built upon the baseline inventories and considered operational projections,
regulatory requirements, adopted port plans, and technology readiness, among other factors.
The forecast was then used to assess constraints in Port’s on-terminal power equipment and
SCL’s power distribution system.
Traditional “poles and wires” utility investments as well as alternative, “non-wires” solutions
(such as battery energy storage and onsite power generation) were evaluated as potential
solutions to address infrastructure constraints.
Finally, port and utility capital investment upgrades were identified, and strategic
recommendations were developed to help manage risk, increase adoption of clean energy
technologies, and provide a holistic approach to investment in port power infrastructure.
KEY FINDINGS
The SWCES provides insights into current and future energy use across Port-owned properties,
as well as the on-terminal and utility-owned power infrastructure serving port facilities. Key
findings from the analysis include:
Port power needs (peak electricity demand) are expected to increase four-fold by 2050.
As fossil-fueled operations transition to electrification, power demand will increase
COMMISSION AGENDA – Briefing Item No. 11b Page 4 of 7
Meeting Date: April 22, 2025
Template revised September 22, 2016.
substantially. Estimates of peak power use at key maritime facilities are modeled to more
than quadruple from 53 megawatts in 2019 to over 225 megawatts by 2050.
Shore power continues to be the key driver of near-term power demand. Of the
expected electrified end uses, shore power use by oceangoing vessels (OGVs) is by far the
most significant driver of near-term demand. Charging of vehicles, vessels and equipment
are expected to be drivers from 2035 and beyond.
Port-adjacent sites are significant contributors to SCL’s load growth. Redevelopment at
“near-port” sites (facilities sharing power distribution feeders with port locations),
notably the United States Coast Guard (USCG) facility at Pier 36 and Washington State
Ferry (WSF) terminal at Pier 52, are expected to contribute significantly to SCL distribution
system constraints in the southern portion of the harbor.
Both SCL and Port electrical infrastructure will face constraints in the future. Of the 16
SCL distribution system feeders serving key maritime facilities, 10 are expected to exceed
electrical capacity planning limits by 2040. In addition, multiple on-terminal Port
substations will face capacity constraints, with eight sites expected to exceed total site
capacity.
Traditional infrastructure solutions are currently most cost-effective. Traditional
solutions such as improvements to substations, feeders and distribution lines are
currently the more cost-effective than distributed, “non-wires” technologies such as
battery energy storage systems in addressing the most significant power distribution
bottlenecks. Technologies should continue to be reviewed over time and considered for
deployment with cargo handling equipment, truck charging, resiliency needs, and other
similar projects to mitigate intermittent loads and demand charges.
Long-term planning and resiliency gaps exist. Long-term plans and resiliency
requirements for port operations and tenants are not currently well defined, which may
limit more holistic investment strategies for individual sites.
RECOMMENDATIONS – STRATEGIES FOR EXECUTION
The SWCES identifies a series of Capital Investments to address capacity constraints along with a
set of eight supportive Strategic Implementation Actions and a Strategy Implementation
Framework.
(1) Capital Investments
Utility distribution system and site-level upgrades are needed to support electrification of port
facilities and equipment. Approximately $208 to $457 million (2024 dollars) in port and utility
investments have been identified through 2050, including an estimated $69 to $168 million in
utility distribution system infrastructure costs and an estimated $139 to $288 million in port on-
site transformer, switchgear, and substation equipment costs (More detail can be found in the
strategy document in Table 5, page 21).
COMMISSION AGENDA – Briefing Item No. 11b Page 5 of 7
Meeting Date: April 22, 2025
Template revised September 22, 2016.
Related support for planning and pre-design activities including infrastructure evaluation, site
planning, tenant and contractor engagement, market assessment, securing tenant zero-
emissions deployment commitments, and feasibility analyses will be important to prepare for
initiation of future projects, particularly those involving higher levels of complexity and long lead-
times. Final investment decisions will need to be made after these deeper analyses are complete.
Financing options and sequencing should be developed and evaluated with key partners and
considered alongside other port funding priorities.
(2) Strategic Implementation Actions
Eight Strategic Actions (SA) to complement capital investments are recommended in the SWCES.
These include:
SA1. Design for Future Electrification Capacity: Increase emphasis on prospective,
“planned-capacity” improvements as a part of a shift from an incremental, project-by-
project approach. Such a shift requires weighing potential risks of stranded assets and
may not be practical in all cases. Monitoring and regular assessment of distribution
system and on-terminal conditions, engagement with end-use stakeholders, modular
designs, technology assessment, and complementary strategies to incent or require
phased-in adoption of electrification technologies can help to mitigate risks.
SA2. Asset Condition Assessment: Assess port electrical asset conditions (e.g. age,
equipment functionality, remaining useful life) and vulnerabilities (e.g. flooding and sea
level rise, groundwater intrusion, seismic hazards) to further inform capital
recommendations and prevent system failures. When combined with an evaluation of
critical facilities for power resiliency (below), a more holistic view of electrical
infrastructure needs and opportunities will be available to inform capital investments
while enhancing project outcomes.
SA3. Identification of Critical Facilities for Resiliency: Assess port facility power resiliency
requirements, including clear identification of critical facilities, utility hazard exposure
and risk, minimum functional operational standards, and tenant requirements. A clear
understanding of facility power resiliency requirements will help to refine site power
distribution options, add value to distributed production and storage options, and assist
with further prioritization of electrification infrastructure investments.
SA4. Integration with Site Master Planning: SWCES findings can help inform port master
site development plans or specific site decarbonization plans that move study
recommendations forward to pre-design and advanced project planning. Master site
plans are needed to ensure compatibility between overlapping planning priorities at Port
sites, including decarbonization, economic development, line of business needs,
resiliency, and others. Such plans should use SWCES data to align strategic goals with site
conditions to guide short and long-term development. Ideally, infrastructure, including
COMMISSION AGENDA – Briefing Item No. 11b Page 6 of 7
Meeting Date: April 22, 2025
Template revised September 22, 2016.
power infrastructure, should provide for the achievement of overall site objectives and
follow an integrated planning effort.
SA5. Infrastructure Management and Development: Consider options for enhancing
management and development of shared infrastructure on port properties to enhance
delivery of infrastructure improvements, manage asset conditions, and help ensure
integrated designs meet overall site-wide plans and business goals.
SA6. Increase Grant Project Readiness: The Port, NWSA, SCL, and industry partners
should use the SWCES results to assess and develop a suite of funding-ready capacity
improvements and decarbonization projects. This may include utility distribution system
assets (e.g. feeders, substations, transformers, switchgear, smart meters, utility-side
storage, etc.), port on-terminal assets (e.g. port substations, solar panels,
communications, duct banks, etc.), and electrification deployment projects (e.g. shore
power, vessel charging, fleets and equipment, building electrification, etc.). Establishing
funding-readiness will allow project partners to more effectively consider external
funding opportunities to help offset the significant costs of upgrades. Careful attention
should be made to grant requirements to avoid additional costs, time delays and overall
risk.
SA7. Clean Technology Development: Apply an innovation-focused maritime
decarbonization lens that encourages assessment and trial of new concepts and
technologies to improve services and help spur electrification technology deployment.
The Port can leverage its concentration of heavy-duty transportation end-uses, diverse
array of properties, high visibility, non-governmental organization (NGO) partnerships,
ambitious emissions reduction targets, and economic development mission to support
pilot projects, new business models, and industry partnerships.
SA8. Innovative Business Models and Financial Strategies: Evaluate as-a-service, elective
pay, innovative rate models, and port Special Purpose District authorities to reduce
financial barriers, recover costs, and support or accelerate adoption of clean energy
technologies and end uses.
(3) Strategy Implementation Framework
The SWCES recommends a Joint Port-Utility Implementation Framework to help drive ongoing
implementation. In accordance with the 2021 Partnering Agreement between the Port, SCL, and
NWSA, the parties agreed to develop an implementation framework to guide ongoing
implementation of the SWCES. This framework lays out capital and end-use deployment
workstreams for ongoing planning and coordination. It will allow the parties to plan for and
coordinate timely delivery of capital projects, assess the pace of technology deployment, support
deployment of electrified equipment, and make necessary adjustments. Included should be long-
lead project planning items such as new utility substations or major transmission line extensions
and significant changes in on-terminal energy needs.
COMMISSION AGENDA – Briefing Item No. 11b Page 7 of 7
Meeting Date: April 22, 2025
Template revised September 22, 2016.
NEXT STEPS
With the completion of the Seattle Waterfront Clean Energy Strategy, staff from the Port, NWSA
and Seattle City Light expect to proceed with implementation activities. Initially, these activities
are expected to include:
(1) Public engagement on the SWCES and related projects.
(2) Briefing the NWSA Managing Members Environmental Working Group
(3) Review of near-term projects for inclusion in Port, NWSA, and SCL Capital Improvement
Plans (CIPs).
(4) Site power master planning starting at selected sites.
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS BRIEFING
(1) Seattle Waterfront Clean Energy Strategy
(2) Partnering Agreement
(3) Presentation slides
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS
Sustainability, Energy, and Climate Committee (SEAC) updates: February 2025, June 2024, May
2023, December 2022, May 2022