
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8e Page 3 of 4
Meeting Date: December 10, 2024
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Wait for the West Waterway Deepening Project
Cost Implications: No additional expenses spent beyond current West Waterway Deepening
Project.
Pros:
(1) Retain Port resources for other priority projects and financial initiatives.
(2) Defer temporary construction impacts.
Cons:
(1) The Puget Sound Pilots will continue to face delays in navigating the largest ships into
T5.
(2) Container vessel operators may choose other Ports due to restrictions on vessel size.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Maintenance Dredge Designated High Spots A, B, C, D, E.
Cost Implications: Allocation of $10,000,000 in expense funds.
Pros:
(1) Clears all the major high spots including the lesser priority ones.
Cons:
(1) High costs to dredge areas that includes non-priority high spots in the federal
navigation channel.
(2) Temporary construction impacts to operations.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 3 – Maintenance Dredge Designated High Spots B & C.
Cost Implications: Allocation of $7,000,000 in expense funds.
Pros:
(1) Addresses the highest priorities high spots identified by the Puget Sound Pilots.
Cons:
(1) Requires allocation of resources that could be used to fund other Port projects.
(2) Temporary construction impacts to operations.
This is the recommended alternative.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary