Outlook
[EXTERNAL] Please reconsider the proposed Des Moines Creek West Business Park development
From Turner Vanessa <vanessanturner@aol.com>
Date Tue 9/24/2024 5:47 PM
To citycouncil@desmoineswa.gov <citycouncil@desmoineswa.gov>; Calkins, Ryan <Calkins.R@portseattle.org>;
Cho, Sam <Cho.S@portseattle.org>; Felleman, Fred <Felleman.F@portseattle.org>; Hasegawa, Toshiko
<Hasegawa.T@portseattle.org>; Mohamed, Hamdi <Mohamed.H@portseattle.org>; Commission-Public-
Records <commission-public-records@portseattle.org>
Cc savedesmoinegreenspaces@gmail.com <savedesmoinegreenspaces@gmail.com>; Tim Irwin
<tim.l.irwin@gmail.com>; Sandy Hunt <HuntSL77@gmail.com>
WARNING: External email. Links or attachments may be unsafe.
Vanessa Irwin
21205 15th Ave S
Des Moines, WA 98198
Vanessanturner@aol.com
206-229-2850
09-24-24
21630 11th Avenue S.
Des Moines, WA 98198
Dear Members of the City of Des Moines City Council,
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed Des Moines Creek West Business Park
development, which would result in the destruction of over 500 trees, wetlands, and valuable green
space at 1432 S. 216th Street. This area is vital not only for its natural beauty but for the significant
environmental services it provides, including air purification, noise reduction, and wildlife habitat. The
trees and wetlands play a crucial role in mitigating the harmful effects of living under the Sea-Tac flight
path, including filtering pollutants such as jet fuel vapors and ultrafine particles.
The community, especially those living under the airport’s flight path, is already disproportionately
affected by air pollution, with higher risks of asthma, cancer, and other health issues. Removing this
natural barrier would further degrade air quality, putting vulnerable populations, particularly children and
the elderly, at greater risk.
Furthermore, the project would destroy valuable recreational trails and remove wildlife habitats critical to
local biodiversity. The Des Moines Creek Trail, which is beloved by the community for outdoor activities,
would be compromised, replacing serene green spaces with industrial infrastructure.
I urge the city to reconsider approving this development and instead explore alternative uses that
preserve the area’s environmental and recreational value. Saving this green space would not only benefit