
COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 8k Page 3 of 4
Meeting Date: July 23, 2024
Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Cease security operations and services at maritime, real estate and Northwest
Seaport Alliance Properties.
Cost Implications: This would reduce annual expenditures by approximately $4 million per year.
However, this would be offset by the inability to receive certain vessels at Port of Seattle and
Northwest Seaport Alliance properties, as well as the potential increase in losses due to criminal
activity and damage to the reputation of the Port of Seattle and Northwest Seaport Alliance.
Pros:
(1) Reduced annual security services contract expense.
Cons:
(1) Inability to comply with U.S. Coast Guard regulatory requirements.
(2) Inability to meet CBP regulatory requirements for operations at Terminal 46
(3) Inability to assist with cruise ship operations at Terminal 91
(4) Significantly increase potential for criminal activities, vandalism, unauthorized camping
on Port of Seattle and Northwest Seaport Alliance properties
(5) Increased risk to insurance claims against the Port of Seattle.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 –Award a single competitively procured security services contract for a period of
up to five years for services to the Port of Seattle, and the Northwest Seattle Seaport Alliance on
a reimbursable basis.
Cost Implications: The estimated expense for this option is approximately $6 million per year over
the five-year life of the contract for a total expense of $30 million. This is based on a best estimate
of current and future security personnel service rates.
Pros:
(1) Provides a consistent five-year contract through one service provider.
(2) Maintains regulatory compliance.
(3) Protects Port of Seattle and Northwest Seaport Alliance personnel and properties.
(4) Opportunity for Women and Minority Business Enterprises (WMBE) to competitively
bid for Security Services contract.
Cons:
(1) Awarded bidder may not be able to satisfy service requirements for the five-year
duration of contract.
This is the recommended alternative.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The financial implications of this request are an annual expense of approximately $6 million per
year over the course of the five-year contract, based on current best estimates of current bill
rates.