
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8h Page 3 of 5
Meeting Date: July 23, 2024
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Do not proceed with the improvements.
Cost Implications: $920,000 (current cost of design that would be expensed if the project does
not proceed.)
Pros:
(1) No further investment required by the Port.
Cons:
(1) Staff support space would remain confined and inefficient.
(2) Does not provide technology enhancements.
(3) Does not upgrade customer restrooms to meet accessibility requirements.
(4) Poor HVAC performance continues to negatively affect workplace conditions.
(5) The project costs to date would need to be expensed.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Minor remodel of existing facility (no expansion), relocate some administration
functions.
Cost Implications: $1,500,000
Pros:
(1) Reduced investment by the Port.
Cons:
(1) Administration functions would not be co-located with operational functions.
(2) Remaining support space would remain inefficient.
(3) Does not provide equitable facilities for staff.
(4) Does not provide technology enhancements.
(5) Does not upgrade customer restrooms to meet accessibility requirements.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 3 – Expand existing facility.
Cost Implications: $3,800,000
Pros:
(1) Administration space is expanded, and equitable facilities provided for staff.
(2) Administration functions remain co-located with operational functions.
(3) Provides technology enhancements.
(4) Upgrades customer restrooms to meet accessibility requirements.
Cons:
(1) Requires greater investment by the Port.
This is the recommended alternative.