
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8f Page 2 of 3
Meeting Date: July 11, 2023
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
during which services may be separately authorized. The Port will not issue any service directives
in excess of each contract’s value or after expiration of the contract ordering period.
JUSTIFICATION
The Port of Seattle’s existing CM Services IDIQ agreements were executed in 2020 and the
contracts are approaching their maximum contract amount. When originally executed, the
amount requested was estimated based on projected project needs to provide consultant
services for 5 years. Actual project needs have utilized the contracted agreements much sooner
than expected. Of the six agreements in place, all but one agreement will be fully utilized by mid-
year 2024.
Diversity in Contracting
The intent is to execute up to six contracts with the most qualified firms; however, we will
redistribute the awarded contract values should we not receive sufficiently qualified firms
without exceeding the combined total $30M amount. Three agreements valued at $6 million
each will be awarded to the three highest-ranked firms, two agreements valued at $4.5 million
each and one agreement valued at $3 million to the next highest-ranked firms in order. We
anticipate a thirty percent (30%) WMBE aspirational participation goal will be included with each
agreement.
DETAILS
Scope of Work
The services required under this agreement are for CM Services in support of various Port
projects for the Aviation, Maritime, and Economic Development divisions, and projects related
to the Northwest Seaport Alliance. The scope of work may include supporting projects with
planning, design, construction and closeout phases of Port major construction or tenant projects,
including contracts procured using design-bid-build, design build, progressive design build and
general contractor/construction management alternative delivery projects.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Advertise and execute multiple individual project specific contracts.
Cost Implications: Potential impact on project schedules with a strong likelihood of additional
project costs due to individualized procurements.
Pros:
(1) Selecting the best consultant expertise to meet the individual project needs.
Cons:
(1) This alternative would require the lengthy and costly process of selecting consultants
for each project, thus requiring increased lead time, additional management oversight,