
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8f Page 3 of 5
Meeting Date: April 11, 2023
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Replace 4 baggage induction doors, construct code required 2-hour area
separation walls, install 10 card readers, and install 10 security cameras.
Cost Implications: $5,000,000
Pros:
(1) Provides increased security.
(2) Standard across multiple doors to allow for maintainability.
(3) Immediate ability to get a notification when a door is left open.
(4) Immediate ability to grant or remove access privileges.
Cons:
(1) Requires larger capital expenditure, more than double the current budget.
(2) Door retrofit may be impacted due to existing infrastructure that may be in the way.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Install 6 card readers and 10 cameras. Replace no doors.
Cost Implications: $2,000,000
Pros:
(1) Requires smaller capital expenditure.
(2) Provides increased security.
(3) Standard across multiple doors to allow for maintainability.
(4) Immediate ability to grant or remove access privileges.
(5) Immediate ability to get a notification when a door is left open.
Cons:
(1) Four existing doors not replaced would still be keyed.
(2) Will not provide the immediate ability to add or remove access at all doors.
(3) Will not prove an immediate ability to get a notification for the door if left open at all
doors.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 3 – Replace 1 baggage conveyor door, install 7 card readers, and install 10 security
cameras.
Cost Implications: $2,900,000
Pros:
(1) Provides increased security.
(2) Requires medium capital expenditure.
(3) Allows other projects to remain fully in control of their own scopes and not rely on this
project to complete one element, i.e., the conveyor door(s).
(4) Immediate ability to grant or remove access privileges.
(5) Immediate ability to get a notification when a door is left open.