3/14/23, 10:00 AM

Mail - Commission-Public-Records - Outlook

https://outlook.office365.com/mail/commission-public-records@portseattle.org/inbox/id/AAQkAGE1YmYzYTk0LWE2N2YtNGZmYi05YjgxLTE5MDVjO…

1/1

[EXTERNAL] public comment on international tourism marketing initiative

Robin Briggs <rbriggs1201@gmail.com>

Mon 3/13/2023 11:47 PM

To: Commission-Public-Records <commission-public-records@portseattle.org>

WARNING: External email. Links or aachments may be unsafe.

I urge you not to fund this initiative. We do not need to advertise to tourists! We get plenty of them

already. We in particular do not need to encourage them to fly, which results in a huge amount of

emissions, or take a cruise, which results in lots of emissions *and* pollutes our waters.

Lets spend this money on an initiative to do off-shore windmills, which will increase our clean electrical

capacity and result in lots of local high wage jobs.

Robin Briggs

Seattle resident

3/15/23, 12:14 PM

Mail - Commission-Public-Records - Outlook

https://outlook.office365.com/mail/commission-public-records@portseattle.org/inbox/id/AAQkAGE1YmYzYTk0LWE2N2YtNGZmYi05YjgxLTE5MDVjO…

1/2

[EXTERNAL] Written Public Comments for 3/14/23 Commission Meeting

James Jennings <JJ@2Jconsulting.net>

Tue 3/14/2023 1:04 PM

To: Commission-Public-Records <commission-public-records@portseattle.org>

WARNING: External email. Links or aachments may be unsafe.

Since I was unable to complete my comments, please include the below as part of the wrien record.

Good aernoon Execuve Director Metruck, President Cho and Commissioners

My name is James Jennings (JJ) and I am here to speak in regard to the Port’s HR-34 and EX-29 policies.

For the beneﬁt of Commissioners Hasegawa and Mohamed, who I have not yet had the pleasure to

meet, I will provide a bit of my background.

I was a Port employee for more than 26 years, having a bit of a Cinderella story career, starng as a

college intern and ﬁnishing as the Director of Aviaon Business and Properes.

As a sample of my work, I stood before many Commissioners here today, laying the groundwork for

many SEA major capital projects, most notably the Concourse C Expansion Project, SEA Gateway Project

and Concourse A Expansion for Airport Lounges. I am not sure if it is commonly known, but I am one of

the employees that was quietly terminated when the Port instuted it’s HR-34 policy requiring

vaccinaon, having received no accommodaon for my sincerely held religious beliefs.

But I am not here today to tread out sour grapes or ask for my job back, in fact I have worked very hard

to move on from my Port employment, currently working with my wife in a small airport consulng

business called 2J Consulng. But one challenge we have had is that we are not currently allowed to

work on-site at Port facilies, due to our vaccinaon status, which limits our potenal work

opportunies to work that can only be completed virtually.

But probably more important, is the fact that not everyone who was terminated has fared as well as I,

and you may hear from some of them today during public tesmony. Many are bier and some connue

to struggle to ﬁnd work, so not allowing them this opportunity to return to the Port feels discriminatory

in light of the current COVID-19 climate and evidence.

So I am here today to ask the Port why it has not retracted or signiﬁcantly modiﬁed their vaccinaon

requirement policies for both employees (HR-34) and contractors (EX-29)?

Clearly the body of evidence and the praccal, polical and scienﬁc jusﬁcaons that underpinned the

development of those policies has dissolved?

Praccally, we all know unvaccinated employees or contractors create no greater risk to the employee

populaon than a vaccinated employee in the workplace (in fact there are hundreds of unvaccinated

tenants and visitors spending signiﬁcant me in Port facilies every month).

Polically, President Biden has long given up on vaccinaon requirements for Federal Contractors (which

was the impetus for the Port’s policy) and both King County and the City of Seale have both retracted

their employee vaccinaon requirements.

Scienﬁcally, even the CDC now recognizes natural immunity as “at least as beneﬁcial” as a vaccine.

Personally, I have had COVID-19 previously, and took a standard anbody test that showed robust

anbodies.

So, what ground then does the Port stand on in keeping these outdated policies?