
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8g Page 3 of 5
Meeting Date: January 24, 2023
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Do Not Increase Authorization
Cost Implications: No change.
Pros:
(1) No change to the capital budget.
(2) Could still utilize $1,700,00 AIP entitlement funds.
Cons:
(1) Would not maximize use of AIP entitlement funds on ageing equipment that is near
end of life. There’s a risk that the Port will return these entitlement funds to the FAA.
(2) More snow equipment would be requested in 2023, requiring another authorization
and procurement.
(3) More revenue bond issuance would be needed to procure equipment.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Increase procurement authorization by two (2) pieces of snow removal
equipment and $1,500,000.
Pros:
(1) Two (2) pieces of snow removal equipment would be procured a year ahead of
replacement plan allowing for improved equipment earlier replacement of broom.
(2) Could utilize $2,900,000 AIP entitlement funds.
Cons:
(1) Would not maximize use of AIP entitlement funds on ageing equipment that is near
end of life. There’s a risk that the Port will return these entitlement funds to the FAA.
(2) More revenue bond issuance would be needed to procure equipment.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 3 – Increase procurement authorization by four (4) pieces of snow removal
equipment and $3,000,000.
Cost Implications: Increased project spend of $3,000,000 to increase possible spending from
$8,620,000 to $11,620,000. With this change AIP entitlement funds could cover up to
$4,065,000.
Pros:
(1) Four (4) pieces of snow removal equipment would be procured a year ahead of
replacement plan allowing for improved equipment earlier replacement of broom.
(2) Airline rate base decreased by $2,400,000.
(3) Procuring equipment one year ahead of schedule will save inflation cost increases
estimated at 6%.