
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8f Page 3 of 5
Meeting Date: January 24, 2023
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
Cons:
(1) Not a long-term solution. Current bucket truck is model year 1994, is nearly 30 years old,
and is beyond useful life. Current bucket truck is not reliable and is not supported well by
the manufacture due to age. Parts are becoming obsolete, and the truck will not always
be repairable.
(2) Rental strategy can take time. 100’+ buckets are not always available and can take 3 to 4
months for rental to arrive.
(3) $15,000+/monthly charges.
(4) Limited to what is available in rental market.
(5) Not always able to respond quickly, postpones critical work by months and it leaves
critical work undone.
(6) Waiting until an unrepairable failure occurs, would make us rent until procurement and
new unit is arrives which can take over 24 months.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Sell current bucket truck and rent bucket truck when needed.
Cost Implications: $15,000+ month in charges. Estimated need of 7 months/year.
Pros:
(1) No capital expenditure.
(2) No maintenance.
(3) No long-term storage required.
(4) Disposes of current bucket truck which is beyond useful life.
Cons:
(1) Rental strategy can take time. 100’+ buckets are not always available and can take 3 to 4
months for rental to arrive.
(2) $15,000+/monthly charges.
(3) Limited to what is available in rental market.
(4) Not always able to respond quickly, postpones critical work by months and it leaves
critical work undone.
(5) Projected to cost $768,348 more over 20 years as compared to buying.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 3 – Procure new lift truck.
Cost Implications: Port would fund purchase through use of revenue bonds estimated at
$800,000.
Pros:
(1) Ability to respond quickly and safely to maintenance needs.