
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8c Page 2 of 3
Meeting Date: July 12, 2022
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
On April 20, 2021, the Port executed a construction contract with Macro-Z-Technology Company
in the amount of $1,644,000.00 with a contract completion date of October 17, 2021. The
Contract has experienced cost and schedule growth, due to several Change Orders for design
changes to accommodate differing site conditions, and operations and maintenance
requirements. Additionally delays in delivery of critical material occurred due supply chain issues
for which the Contractor is entitled to additional time. As a result, actual Substantial Completion
was not issued until February 3, 2022, 109 days after the original contract completion date.
Discussions with the Contractor are ongoing, but upon agreement, this Change Order will
encompass any credit due to the Port for any impacts to the Port and additional time and cost
due the Contractor.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Do not authorize the issuance of the Change Order, continue further Dispute
Resolution Processes.
Pros:
(1) Further negotiations may result in a larger credit back to the Port.
Cons:
(1) Delays project closeout and increase Port costs to continue negotiations.
(2) Creates a risk of potential for litigation.
(3) Additional staff soft costs, potential legal expenses.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Authorize the issuance of the Change Order to extend the Contract duration by
up to 109 days. If executed, this will be the final Change Order on this project and will settle all
outstanding claims between the Contractor and Port.
Pro:
(1) Settles all claims between the Port and Contractor and allows contract close-out to
commence.
Cons:
(1) Eliminates potential additional credit to the Port.
This is the recommended alternative.
ATTACHMENTS
None.