
Page 3 of 4
Removing angular rock from bankline to increase potential for shoreline
vegetation
Removing debris from the bankline and seabed
o Consider use of Reinhall piles to reduce underwater noise during pile driving
• Materials
o Consider alternative design materials for replaced structures
Low-embodied carbon concrete
Alternatives to concrete
Alternative floatation materials
• Water Quality
o Look into options to address spill containment where feasible
• Financial Sustainability
o Balance project cost and function against environmental benefits
SUSTAINABLE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK CRITERIA
The goals identified by the SPARC team support three of the seven criteria articulated in the SEF
Policy Directive:
• Reduce GHG Emissions. The design acknowledges the need for shore power and will
accommodate the existing system during float replacement.
• Increase Resilience. The proposed improvements will upgrade the existing system to provide
necessary structural support, limiting future damage to the existing structures and allowing for
the docks to meet current and future intended function.
• Protect Health and the Environment. This project focuses on the replacement and upgrade of
existing infrastructure while limiting environmental impacts. Goals focus on materials, habitat,
and water quality.
THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION
The SDA is required to include a recommendation as to whether a project should pursue an applicable
third-party sustainability certification (such as LEED or Envision.) Staff does not recommend
pursuing certification for this project, but may apply principles from the American Society of Civil
Engineers “Envision” rating system to help inform the design as appropriate.
NEXT STEPS
SPARC recommendations within this SDA will be presented to commission along with the request for
authorization for design funds. The Project Manager and Sustainability Coordinator will continue to
work with the SPARC team to develop a Draft Sustainable Design Strategy (SDS) that defines
alternatives to meet the goals that are included herein. The Draft SDS will be presented to the Energy
and Sustainability (E&S) Committee to present sustainable design elements that are incorporated in 30
percent design.
The SEF Policy Directive requires that the project team evaluate and quantify the sustainability costs
and benefits of the SDA. This will be completed iteratively as the design progresses, making sure to