COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 6g Page 2 of 3
Meeting Date: June 9, 2020
Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
service directives. Service directives may only be issued during the contract ordering period and
within the total original contract value.
Individual service directives consisting of a scope, level of effort, and schedule will be
negotiated and executed as needed. Funds will be derived from separate project authorization
requests so there is no funding request associated with this memo.
Scope of Work
General scope of work will cover planning, design, permitting and construction support
pertaining to dredging and navigational access at Port of Seattle and NWSA Maritime facilities.
Schedule
The IDIQ service agreement will have a contract ordering period of five years during which
service directives may be issued. Each service directive will specify the scope, duration, and
schedule associated with the work. This contract ordering period will ensure continuity of
efforts. The contract may extend past the five-year ordering period, but no new service
directives will be issued after the ordering period or when contract funding capacity is reached,
whichever occurs first.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Procure project-specific contracts to support capital and operational activities
Pros:
(1) Expands opportunities for firms to participate.
Cons:
(1) Doesn’t allow for preliminary work to support capital projects or operational activities
(2) Does not allow for time-sensitive tasks, leading to delays and increased costs.
(3) Inhibits continuity and development of institutional knowledge.
(4) Staffing costs significantly increase to support contract procurement and
administration.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – channelization drawingsEnter into IDIQ contracts managed by Port staff
Pros:
(1) Enables time-sensitive projects.
(2) Enables high-capacity projects.
(3) Aligns staff and technical expertise to varying workloads.
(4) Improves continuity and institutional knowledge.
(5) Reduces contract procurement and administration as well as technical staffing costs.
Cons: None.
This is the recommended alternative.