
Service Tunnel Renewal/Replacement Project
Executive Summary
Internal Audit (IA) completed an audit of the Service Tunnel Renewal/Replacement Project for the
period November 2017 through March 2020. The audit was performed to assess the quality of the
Port’s monitoring of the project to assure it is meeting project management standards in an efficient
and effective manner.
The SEA Airport service tunnel is located below the Airport arrivals drive and runs the full length of the
main terminal. The 2,500 foot long service tunnel was designed, constructed and commissioned in
phases between 1968 and 1974. The tunnel is an essential Airport facility and is structurally linked to
other critical Airport infrastructure. The roof of the tunnel forms the support for most of the Airport’s
arrivals drive and portions of the departures drive. Additionally, the tunnel provides critical secured
access to the central heating plant and its supporting infrastructure.
The project delivery method was a design-bid-build with a lump sum contract. As of March 2020, there
were approximately $1.9 million in change orders which have been covered through the original
project contingency of approximately $2.3 million. The current construction contract was $25.9 million
with an estimated contract completion date of August 02, 2020.
We selected this project to audit based on the number of change orders. We selected the largest
dollar value change orders, ones that changed the scope of the project and those that were errors and
omissions. Based on our testing and work performed, we did not find any evidence that the change
orders were not justified.
We noted that the Service Tunnel Project team worked collaboratively with the general contractor,
James D. Fowler Co., to assure the project ran smoothly and stayed within budget. We did note an
instance, through no fault of the Service Tunnel Project, where the Port incurred $160,000 in additional
costs because of another major project’s schedule slippage. With multiple major capital projects
occurring concurrently at the SEA Airport, it is critical that each project stays on schedule. If one
project’s schedule slips, it will often impact other projects and the Port will continue to incur additional
costs. Additional information is provided in Appendix B on page 7.
We do not have any reportable issues; however, we did identify an opportunity to improve processes
related to the verification of financial reports submitted to the Port from the contractor, that we
communicated to Port management separately via a letter.
Glenn Fernandes, CPA
Director, Internal Audit
Responsible Management Team
Wayne Grotheer, Director AVM PMG
Nora Huey, Director Central Procurement Office
Tina Soike, Chief Engineer and Director of Engineering Services
Janice Zahn, Asst. Engineering Director- Construction