
1
To: Ryan Calkins, Commissioner
Stephanie Bowman, Commissioner
Chris Gehrke, Public Member
From: Glenn Fernandes, Director, Internal Audit
Date: May 7, 2020
Subject: Interlocal Agreement (ILA) Mapping and Risk Ranking
Background
At the December 9, 2019, Audit Committee, Commissioner Calkins requested a listing of Port ILA’s to
obtain a high-level understanding of how the deliverables are tracked and whether they are met. An
interlocal agreement is a written contract between local government agencies such as a city, a county, a
school board or a constitutional office. Any time a public service involves the joint operations and budgets
of two or more local government agencies, an ILA must be created and approved by all sides.
The Revised Code of Washington 39.34.040 states: “Prior to its entry into force, an agreement made
pursuant to this chapter shall be filed with the county auditor or, alternatively, listed by subject on a
public agency’s web site or other electronically retrievable public source.” Commissioner Calkins request
was made to lay the ground work for perhaps an audit in 2021 and included the following deliverables:
1) A mapping of the responsible department to each ILA, and
2) A ranking by risk
Approach
Internal Audit (IA) obtained the listing of current ILA’s from the Port’s publicly facing source. The listing
contained 36 agreements. The Central Procurement Office provided hard copies of each agreement and
assisted IA in determining the responsible department. Risk was assessed using three criteria:
1) Financial (weighted at 50%): A rating of one was assigned if the Port liability was less than
$1,000,000; a rating of two between $1,000,000 and $4,999,999; a rating of three greater than
$5,0000,000.
2) Legal (weighted at 30%): A rating of one for an agency to agency agreements; a rating of two if
the agreement was binding by state issued court order; a rating of three if the agreement was
binding by a federal court order.
3) Complexity (weighted at 20%): A rating of one was given if the ILA was advisory in nature or
required a study; a rating of two for construction related; a rating of three for environmental
cleanup of hazardous waste.
Results
Appendix A (below) lists the 36 ILA’s, ranked from highest to lowest risk. We intend to incorporate this
analysis into our annual risk assessment when developing our 2021 audit plan. We will then select a
sample of ILA’s which we will audit to assure compliance to stated deliverables.