COMMISSION AGENDA – Briefing Item No. 9b Page 8 of 9
Meeting Date: May 28, 2019
Template revised September 22, 2016.
went forward. In the end, SB 5376 did not garner consensus and no legislation on data privacy
or facial recognition moved forward this session.
Aircraft noise abatement: Rep. Pellicciotti’s proposed legislation, HB 1847, to expand the
boundaries within which the Port has statutory authority to conduct noise abatement
programming was not considered for a vote in the Senate prior to the final “opposite chamber
cutoff” of the year, and it died. Because this was the first year of a “legislative biennium,” it will
remain an active legislative proposal when the 2020 legislative session convenes next year.
Port automation prohibition: For a brief few days in Olympia, early in session, it looked as
though port districts and labor unions may have cause for substantial disagreement. SB 5905
was introduced by Senator Saldaña on February 13
th
, and would’ve prohibited port districts
from using public funds to purchase equipment that could lead to automation of operations.
That bill instantly attracted the attention and opposition of port districts, and the sponsor
agreed to remove it from its public hearing and not bring it up again this session. It will remain
an active proposal in 2020.
Transportation Network Companies: In spite of a series of lengthy and substantive meetings
over the interim, Uber, Lyft, and their various regulators and local government stakeholders
(i.e. City of Seattle, Port of Seattle, King County, City of Tacoma, City of Everett, Washington
State Association of Cities, Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, etc.) could not reach agreement on
legislation to establish a statewide regulatory regime. That was the goal of the summer
stakeholder meetings convened by King County, but the conversation tended to reach deadlock
when issues of data sharing and background checks came to the table. No consensus bill was
introduced in Olympia, then, but the TNCs did introduce the bill they’ve sought in each of the
last three sessions. It was opposed by those government groups mentioned above, and others,
and did not move forward this session.
Greenhouse Gases and the State Environmental Policy Act: The Port of Seattle signed in
“other” at a House Environment and Energy Committee hearing on HB 1549, a bill that directed
the Department of Ecology to initiate a rulemaking to clarify how greenhouse gas emissions are
calculated under the State Environmental Policy Act. The proposal was the subject of advocacy
from the Washington Public Ports Association but was opposed by the Department of Ecology
and the Washington Environmental Council. Staff followed up our “other” sign-in with a brief
email statement to the Committee expressing general support for the intent of the bill but
affirming that the Commission did not yet have an official position on the measure. That bill
died but was expected to become a budget proviso establishing a stakeholder process for the
interim, intended to give Ecology direction to begin a rulemaking process in this area. The final
budget compromise DID NOT include a budget proviso funding this stakeholder process, so it
remains on hold.