
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 8d Page 3 of 4
Meeting Date: January 22, 2019
Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Do Nothing – The Port would not pursue a new consolidated airport traveler
mobility assistance services contract and forego the provision of assistance service for guests
with disabilities. The current contract would expire in December 2019 without replacement.
Cost Implications: $0. No additional costs are related to the pursuit of this option.
Pros:
(1) No additional action is required by Port staff and expenses related to mobility services
would be used for other Airport priorities.
Cons:
(1) Ceasing mobility assistance service means Sea-Tac is less accessible to the traveling
public resulting in more complaints and fundamental degradation in customer service
levels.
(2) Staff are concerned about legal risk related to ceasing mobility services at the Airport.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Request for Proposal (RFP) – The Port would pursue a new RFP for mobility
assistance services at Sea-Tac Airport and terminate the existing vendor’s contract with notice
per contract provisions prior to the start of cruise operations in May 2019.
Cost Implications: New contract value is $1,500,000 with a 5-year term
Pros:
(1) Provides a means of enhancing customer service and expanding assistance offerings in
the following ways:
o Improved customer service training requirements
o Single-vendor results in more efficient communication with Port representatives
o Timeliness provisions for feedback and addressing customer service issues
o Enforceable and quantifiable quality assurance provisions to ensure
responsiveness
Cons:
(1) Increased customer service requirements may result in higher rates
This is the recommended alternative.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds
Expenses related to the provision of mobility assistance services will be included in the Landside
department’s annual operating budget. The 2019 budget included $300,000 for this service.
The funding source would be the Airport Development Fund.