Template revised April 12, 2018.
COMMISSION
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Item No.
6d
ACTION ITEM
Date of Meeting
January 22, 2019
DATE: January 10, 2019
TO: Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director
FROM: Wendy Reiter, Director Aviation Security
SUBJECT: Perimeter Intrusion Detection System (CIP #C800844)
Amount of this request:
$3,520,000
Total estimated project cost:
$10,000,000
ACTION REQUESTED
Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to authorize to (1) proceed with
the first phase in the Perimeter Intrusion Detection capital project at Seattle-Tacoma
International Airport; (2) procure required hardware, software, vendor services, and license and
maintenance; and (3) use Port staff for implementation, for a total phase one cost not to
exceed $3,500,000 and estimated training of $20,000. A 10-year contract for license and
maintenance fees is estimated at $420,000.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this authorization request is to create an additional security layer for portions of
the Airport perimeter using technology for continuous monitoring, threat assessment, and
alerts. This improved capability is an important part of the Aviation Security Plan.
Perimeter detection systems include a range of technologies that provide reliable detection of
an intruder, and integrated with a video surveillance system, allow for visual verification and
assessment for appropriate security or operational response. Enhanced perimeter intrusion
detection (PIDS) at Sea-Tac airport is most economically provided using a variety of
technologies appropriate for the selected coverage areas. Radar or similar technology can cover
a large amount of the visible perimeter with centrally located detection devices. In areas with
visibility obstructions, integrated fencing systems will better meet security requirements. This
layered approach for perimeter security improvements will advance the Port’s capabilities to
detect and analyze intrusion events and enable rapid, coordinated responses.
The full PIDS capital budget includes scope to implement multiple technology solutions for
selected coverage areas. To maximize our investment, the solution will be delivered in two
phases. The scope of this initial phase includes the procurement and full implementation of
only the radar, or similar technology, intrusion detection system. Once the coverage area for
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 6d Page 2 of 5
Meeting Date: January 22, 2019
Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
the first phase is finalized, a second phase for fencing intrusion detection will be brought
forward for authorization. The authorization request for this initial phase includes no funding
for the planned second phase.
Aviation Security, Information & Communication Technology (ICT), Aviation Maintenance
(AVM), and Port Construction Services (PCS) will collaborate to complete this project. Total cost
for this initial phase is estimated to be $3,520,000. Ten-year license and maintenance fees are
estimated at $420,000. Recurring license and maintenance costs will be budgeted within the
Aviation Maintenance department operating budget. The cost of both phases was included in
the 2019-2023 capital budget and plan of finance in the amount of $10,000,000.
JUSTIFICATION
Enhancements to our perimeter security have been identified as critical in ensuring public
safety and improving operational efficiencies through automation. The new system will be part
of a layered protection strategy that incorporates people, processes, and technology to
decrease security risk and increase situational awareness. When integrated with existing
security systems, it will provide a comprehensive picture to security and safety personnel and
facilitate coordinated responses.
The authorization for the first phase will provide for selected areas of the airport perimeter:
(1) Continuous monitoring for selected coverage areas.
(2) Algorithm-based threat assessment with the ability to proactively distinguish between
normal operations and a potential threat.
(3) Robust alerting capabilities.
(4) Directional tracking of potential intrusions enabling rapid responses to mitigate issues.
DETAILS
Scope of Work for First Phase
(1) Procure and implement a radar or similar technology solution to enhance perimeter
security for selected coverage areas.
(2) Integrate with existing security systems to provide a comprehensive picture and
operational efficiencies.
Schedule for First Phase
Commission Authorization
2019 Quarter 1
Product Selection
2019 Quarter 3
Implementation
2021 Quarter 3
Cost Breakdown
This Request
Total Project
PIDS Hardware, Software, and Vendor Services
$1,975,000
$4,000,000
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 6d Page 3 of 5
Meeting Date: January 22, 2019
Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
Port of Seattle Labor
$1,200,000
$2,500,000
Hardware Installation
$325,000
$3,500,000
Training
$20,000
$20,000
Total
$3,520,000
$10,040,000
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED FOR FIRST PHASE
Alternative 1 – Implement the Initial Phase of the Perimeter Intrusion Detection System
Project
Cost Implications: Phase One Cost: $3,520,000 + Operating Expense: $42,000 per year
Pros:
(1) Provides continuous monitoring, real-time intrusion alarms, threat assessment,
location and information for appropriate and coordinated security and operational
responses for selected coverage areas.
(2) Remote location, tracking, identification and assessment capability for multiple
business units that aids quicker response and resource coordination.
(3) Ability to respond rapidly and in a coordinated manner based on assessment of
intrusion.
(4) Additional data and robust reporting capabilities for post-incident assessment and
analysis of intrusion types.
Cons:
(1) Capital funds are not available for other efforts.
(2) Requires an additional FTE to manage and maintain the system.
(3) There is a risk that the product selected will require more construction than estimated
although research supports the requested budget.
This is the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Security Staff Augmentation
Cost Implications: $400,000 per year
Pros:
(1) Utilizes current processes with 4.5 added FTE staff for additional patrols to increase
awareness and identification.
(2) Aviation Security has more personnel available to respond and assist during an event.
Cons:
(1) No ability to provide continuous monitoring, real-time alerting, identification and
coordinated response to intrusion(s).
(2) Higher operating cost for 4.5 additional FTE and increased vehicle maintenance.
(3) No automated reporting capabilities.
(4) Increases ramp congestion and potential safety hazards due to extra vehicles in the
area.
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 6d Page 4 of 5
Meeting Date: January 22, 2019
Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
(5) Reduces, but does not eliminate, lag time between ground intrusion and detection.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 3 – Implement no new technology for perimeter intrusion detection
Cost Implications: $0
Pros:
(1) No additional capital or operating costs required
Cons:
(1) No ability to provide continuous monitoring, real-time alerting, identification and
coordinated response to intrusion(s)
(2) Doesn’t increase patrols nor add resources for event responses
(3) No automated reporting capabilities
This is not the recommended alternative.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary
Capital
Expense
Total
COST ESTIMATE
Original estimate
$10,000,000
$20,000
$10,020,000
AUTHORIZATION
Previous authorizations
0
0
0
Current request for authorization
$3,500,000
$20,000
$3,520,000
Total authorizations, including this request
$3,500,000
$20,000
$3,520,000
Remaining amount to be authorized
$6,500,000
$20,000
$6,520,000
Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds
This project CIP #C800844 was included in the 2019-2023 capital budget and plan of finance in
the amount of $10,000,000. The project will be delivered in two phases. This capital request for
the initial phase is estimated at $3,500,000. The full capital project will be submitted to the
airlines for Majority-in-Interest approval. The funding source is the Airport Development Fund.
Financial Analysis and Summary
Project cost for analysis
$10,000,000
Business Unit (BU)
Airfield Movement Area
Effect on business performance (NOI
after depreciation)
NOI after depreciation will increase
IRR/NPV (if relevant)
N/A
CPE Impact
$0.03 in 2022
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 6d Page 5 of 5
Meeting Date: January 22, 2019
Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
Future Revenues and Expenses (Total cost of ownership)
Estimated 10-year hardware and software maintenance costs of $420,000 will be budgeted in
the Aviation Maintenance operating budget beginning in 2021. One additional Aviation
Maintenance staff will be required to support the new system.
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST
None
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS
None
