PORT COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES Page 2 of 2
TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2018
Minutes of August 7, 2018, submitted for review September 20, 2018, and proposed for approval September 25, 2018.
Minds, which provides career development opportunities for working adults returning to
school.
There are numerous STEM-related industry, education, investment, and community
organization collaborators in the Spokane area.
Rural economic development efforts and strategic approach of the Association of
Washington Business (AWB) was discussed.
Employment and job growth remain sluggish in rural areas of Washington, despite rural
areas accounting for 25 percent of Washington jobs and several leading U.S. exports.
Ferry, Stevens, and Pend Oreille Counties have suffered from federal and state
regulatory changes that have affected timber harvesting and gold mining with a
disproportionate economic impact due to the rural nature of those areas.
Issues affecting the rural economy identified in summits convened by AWB include lack
of rural broadband service, workforce deficiencies, inadequate infrastructure, and lack of
affordable workforce housing.
Adams County and much of southeast Washington are limited by lack of rural broadband
service.
AWB’s recommendations for infrastructure investment to yield job production and
increased economic activity focus on provision of water, energy transmission, rural
communications, and roads, bridges, and ports.
Commissioners opined on the attractiveness of Washington’s rural areas to visitors.
Cyber security considerations for power delivery systems were illustrated using the case
of a Russian cyber-attack launched in 2015 on utility control rooms in Ukraine.
Models of cyber security based on principles of least privilege and defense in depth were
described and security models for inclusive, large networks versus multiple, smaller
networks were illustrated.
The condition of the communications network in Whitman County and the precursors to
efforts to obtain authority for ports to invest in rural broadband infrastructure were
described.
There was a discussion of the advantages for ports engaging in provision of broadband
infrastructure rather than other entities, such as utility districts or municipalities, based on
the business model of a port authority and its capacity to work with the private sector on
a long-term return on investment.
Benefits of the Port of Seattle pursuing installation of broadband infrastructure were
noted, including the opportunity to ensure equitable provision of services to rural,
economically disadvantaged areas, economic development opportunities, net neutrality,
and the potential to reduce or control the port’s own operating costs over time.
The meeting adjourned at approximately 4:15 p.m.
Prepared: Attest:
Paul J. White, Commission Clerk Ryan Calkins, Commission Secretary
Minutes approved: September 25, 2018.