
Motion 2018-07: IAF Executive Review Panel Page 2 of 2
competitive solicitation process. These contracts will be filed with the commission and made
available for public inspection.
STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION
The Port of Seattle is in the midst of construction of an International Arrivals Facility (IAF) at the
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport to accommodate growing international air traffic driven
by business and population growth in the Seattle region. The port elected to use the
progressive design-build project delivery method for the project. Contractor/designer teams
were interviewed with Clark/SOM selected to deliver the project.
The commission, in its oversight role, finds it necessary for an independent panel to undertake
a third-party peer review and validation process for the IAF project and to convene an
independent panel of construction experts to review the project and make recommendations
prior to the commission’s authorization of a GMP for the project. The commission will receive
the report and recommendation of the Executive Review Panel prior to making a decision on
the GMP.
The Executive Review Panel will provide the commission with its observations, information,
answer questions, and make recommendations for the immediate path forward on the project
in addition to future use of this project delivery method.
The panel shall convene and conduct a third-party review of the IAF project including the
following:
Interview commissioners to understand concerns and relevant questions
Interview port staff, staff of the Clark/SOM contractor team, and review relevant
documents
Consider the progressive design-build contract from a construction and cost perspective
Review project cost escalation of allocation of costs to date
Consider construction documents and any other documents and information relevant to
the proposed GMP
Within 60 days from commencement of the work, the Executive Review Panel will prepare a
report back to the commission on the following:
Review of the Port Capital Development Department’s management and oversight of
the progressive design-build process
Review basis for cost escalation
Evaluate the proposed GMP and identify if further review is necessary
Identify recommendations regarding management structure and oversight of the
project going forward through delivery.
Provide other findings of relevance as found during the review.