
COMMISSION AGENDA – Briefing Item No. 9B Page 2 of 3
Meeting Date: February 13, 2018
Template revised September 22, 2016.
internal stakeholders to finalize the package of near-term projects to be proposed for
environmental review and anticipates briefing Commission in April.
The second step is to better understand the constraints for airside facilities, which includes
runway and taxiway utilization, gate availability, and airspace management as conducted by
FAA. The Port will work with the FAA to conduct an airfield/airspace study which will
determine the long-term capacity of the airfield and inform or reaffirm the SAMP long-term
vision.
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND
Staff is scheduled to request additional Commission authorization for funds to complete the
SAMP documentation and provide planning support to environmental review of the near-term
projects for the duration of that process. Staff will provide additional information with the
scheduled authorization request, including justification and alternatives to providing additional
funding. There are two primary factors which have contributed to an increased cost of analysis,
documentation, project management, and contract administration of the SAMP. One factor is
extensive airside modeling and coordination with the FAA required to analyze the ability of the
SAMP long-term vision to accommodate unconstrained demand and the ability of the near-
term projects to accommodate near-term demand. The other primary factor is additional
analysis and documentation required due to the identification of alternatives involving one vs
two terminals.
The environmental review will be led by Landrum & Brown, a consultancy firm specializing in
environmental review and currently under contract with the Port. Continued planning support
services are needed to finalize SAMP documentation, conduct additional public outreach,
transition the SAMP to environmental review and provide planning support during
environmental review process. SAMP documentation is required to gain concurrence from the
FAA regarding the near-term projects and approach to environmental review, and to serve as
the public facing document explaining the planning process and findings.
Planning analysis and supporting documentation required to transition the SAMP to
environmental review includes: 1) an analysis of a “no action alternative” which will be used to
compare the relative impacts of taking no action to the impacts of implementing the SAMP
near-term projects and 2) the drafting of detailed project descriptions which will include
information regarding construction quantities and activities which are required to assess
construction impacts of near-tem projects implementation.
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS BRIEFING
(1) Presentation slides