COMMISSION AGENDA – Briefing Item No. 7e Page 5 of 6
Meeting Date: October 24, 2017
current evaluation criteria, for example, return on investment or total cost of 141
ownership. 142
143
A clear Sustainability Evaluation Framework will increase transparency of the 144
Commission decision-making process. The Committee also recognizes that the 145
Port’s existing decision-making processes include consideration of environmental 146
and social criteria, but the framework is intended to increase transparency both 147
within Port decision-making processes and with the community. In the past, the 148
factors considered and the final decision to pursue or reject a potential project 149
may not always be elevated to the Port Commission. With this motion, these 150
factors will be evaluated and presented to Commission. 151
152
Valuing and internalizing the external costs of carbon 153
154
This item instructs staff to explore a method of creating internal financial 155
incentives for carbon reduction, such as determining or calculating an internal 156
cost of carbon, for Port programs and departments. This could be a tool to 157
reduce Port scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions. 158
Port-wide Sustainability Effort 159
160
Currently, the Port has a skilled environmental team focused on compliance with 161
some dedicated sustainability expertise at the airport. The Interim Executive 162
Director has included resources in the 2018 budget to support the sustainability 163
activities developed by the Committee and staff per the April 11, 2017 “Motion 164
Amending the Port of Seattle Century Agenda Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals,” 165
that was unanimously supported by the Commission. That Motion instructed the 166
Environment and Sustainability Center of Expertise (COE) to “to prepare an 167
assessment of the actions, resources, and timelines necessary to develop and 168
implement Policy Directives for review by the Commission, informed by the 169
Committee work groups.” In response, the COE delivered the “Energy and 170
Sustainability Policy Directive Resource Assessment” to the Commission on July 171
11, 2017, see Attachment B. 172
173
In coordination with the Committee, the Executive Director reviewed the 174
Resource Assessment and will embed the recommended sustainability activities 175
as described in Attachment C – Sustainability Resource Allocation 176
Reccomendation. 177