
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 4g Page 2 of 3
Meeting Date: December 12, 2017
Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
There is no funding request associated with this authorization. Individual service directives will
be executed to authorize the consultant to perform specific work on the contract against
approved project authorizations and within the total contract amount.
The larger contract of $700,000 will have a small business subcontracting goal and the smaller
contract of $300,000 will be small business directed.
As Port-wide contracts, these contracts are also available to the rest of the organization.
Scope of Work
The IDIQ contracts will be procured according to Port policies and procedures in accordance
with Resolution No. 3605, as amended, and procurement policy CPO-1. The Port will advertise
and issue a request for qualifications (RFQ) that will include a contract set aside of $250,000 for
small business and an additional goal for small business participation in the larger contract(s).
The contracts will be written with specific not-to-exceed amounts and identify the services
required. Each contract will have a contract-ordering period (during which the services may be
separately authorized) of five years. The actual contract duration may extend beyond the
scheduled end date in order to complete work identified in service directives authorized prior
to the expiration date. Service directives may be issued during the contract-ordering period and
within the total original contract value.
Schedule
It is estimated that the contracts will be executed by April 2018 and have a five-year Ordering
period. Each service directive will specify the duration and schedule associated with the task or
tasks involved.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Alternative 1 – Prepare separate procurements each time professional services are needed for
specific building and structure projects.
Cost Implications: Unknown; individual project authorizations and the annual approved budget
expenditures, in addition to more staff time spent procuring and managing contracts.
Pros:
(1) Separate contracts would allow consulting firms multiple opportunities to compete
for each individual project.
Cons:
(1) This alternative would increase overhead and administrative cost to the Port, as we
would need to manage more procurement processes and contracts.
(2) This alternative may add four months to each project schedule to complete the
procurement process for each individual project and would negatively impact the
ability to meet project and customer needs.