
COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 4d Page 3 of 4
Meeting Date: June 27, 2017
Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
(2) While redundant firewalls are in place to ensure an individual firewall failure doesn’t
immediately put our organization network in jeopardy, the failing equipment must be
replaced or we risk the serious operational impacts of a total failure.
(3) Individual firewall failures would need to be replaced with 3rd party equipment,
reducing our effectiveness and ability to manage the system. This 3rd party
equipment is extremely scarce at the moment and will be increasingly hard to find as
the market matures.
(4) A catastrophic firewall failure would expose the Port’s information systems and
sensitive data to cyber-attacks.
(5) This solution will not scale to accommodate future needs that will require faster
throughput and more advanced security features.
This is not the recommended alternative.
Alternative 2 – Purchase and install redundant network firewall systems for the Port’s
Enterprise network
Cost Implications: $1,500,000
Pros:
(1) Significantly improves the protection of our data and information systems that are
increasingly more vulnerable to cyber-attacks as a result of potential equipment
failure and the growing sophistication of cyber threats.
(2) Improves our flexibility, performance, and management capability to meet current
and future technology requirements.
(3) Provides a common management platform across multiple Port networks.
(4) Meets future requirements for faster throughput and advanced security features.
Cons:
(1) Capital funding is not available for other efforts.
This is the recommended alternative.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary