
Club International Lounge
Third-Party Arrangements Operational Audit
6
2.) Monitoring of the operating expenses was adequate
The scope of the audit covered the period from of March 2010 to present.
Department Highlights and Accomplishments
The Club International Lounge started off with one airline and has grown to serve two airlines.
Passenger counts and revenue have increased by 30 percent since its inception. The lounge is
a profitable model in 2011. There are plans to add liquor service and additional airlines.
Audit Scope and Methodology
We conducted the audit to determine whether the contractor was in compliance with the terms
of the management agreement. We utilized a risk-based audit approach from planning to test
sampling. We performed a multitude of information gathering methods including research,
interviews, observations, and analytical reviews in order to obtain a complete understanding of
the Club International Lounge operations. We conducted an assessment of significant risks
associated with the Port’s management of the third-party agreement, and identified controls to
mitigate those risks. We evaluated whether the implemented controls were functioning as
intended. Based on the risk assessment, we established the area of audit focus.
We applied additional detailed audit procedures to areas with the highest likelihood of significant
negative impact as follows:
1. Compliance with the management agreement
• To determine compliance with contract procurement requirements, we reviewed
documentation related to the advertisement for request for proposal (RFP), submitted
proposals, and the selection process including a scoring summary.
• To determine compliance with the spending limitations set by the agreement, we
compared budgeted to actual expenditures for the first six months of 2011.
• We selected and reviewed a risk-based sample of 28 checks to determine if expenses
were valid, legitimate and related to lounge operations.
• To determine the propriety of payroll expense reimbursements, including benefits, we
reviewed January and April of 2011 reimbursements. Each transaction was analyzed,
recalculated, and agreed to the reimbursements.
• To determine compliance with insurance requirements, we reconciled insurance
requirements to the coverage reflected in the certificate of insurance in force for a 12-
month period ending 3/15/2012.
2. Management Monitoring