
COMMISSION AGENDA
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer
May 30, 2011
Page 2 of 4
The original funding authorization, however, did not fully account for work to be done under parts 2
and 3 of the contract, namely the costs of actuarial services needed for the Port’s Other Post-
Employment Benefits (OPEB) liability for retiree life insurance and Warehouse Pension Trust; and
other costs associated with optimal plan administration, such as the costs of compliance and planning
related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), which was passed in March
2010; or the full costs of consultant support for an enhanced wellness program and a possible account-
based health plan offering. Authorization of additional funds will allow the Port to continue to achieve
savings as part of the overall health care benefit cost containment effort. The additional consulting
support that will be available with the contract amendment would be appropriate regardless of whether
the Port-sponsored health plans were self-insured or fully insured, and the additional funding will not
diminish savings resulting from the conversion of the Port-sponsored plans to self-insured status.
BACKGROUND:
In January 2010 the Port issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to select a Benefits Consultant to support
the conversion to self-insured health plans, provide consulting support to the new self-insured health
plans, serve as a broker for the insured benefit plans, and perform actuarial analysis work in support of
the Port’s OPEB liability and the Warehouse Pension Trust. The Port had previously utilized a
Benefits Consultant to provide consulting and brokerage support to the fully insured benefit plans.
Prior to 2010, the benefits consulting fees were paid through commissions earned by the Consultant on
the Port’s fully insured benefit plans.
The 2010 RFP was the first RFP issued for benefits consulting services with the current procurement
and contracting processes. Historically, the Port had been able to utilize commissions received by the
consultant in excess of the agreed to annual fee to support in depth research, analysis, costing,
communication or consulting needs related to the Port’s benefit plans. When requesting authorization
for the benefits consulting contract that resulted from the January 2010 RFP, we did not recognize that
we would have continuing needs for additional research, analysis, costing, communication and
consulting support. As such, we requested funding authorization for an amount we believed would
cover the on-going support to our benefits plans and the needed actuarial services.
Towers Watson was selected through the competitive selection process as the Port’s Benefits
Consultant. The contract with Towers Watson includes fees to assist the transition to self-insured
medical and dental plans, annual fees to support the on-going administration of the Port’s self-insured
medical and dental plans, as well as fees to help administer the other benefit plans that remained fully
insured (i.e., Group Health medical coverage, life insurance, and disability insurance). The contract
that we negotiated with Towers Watson also included the actuarial support for the Warehouse Pension
Trust and the OPEB liability. The authorized amount of the contract, however, was not sufficient to
cover the transition to self-funding support, on-going benefits consulting support for the remaining
term of the contract, and actuarial support for the full potential term of the contract (five years) or any
additional work beyond the on-going support of the current programs.
We are not certain what consulting support we will need, or want, to have Towers Watson consultants
perform through the end of the current contract. We may need to have analytical work performed to
assess implications of health care reform legislation. We may benefit from their support to develop
strategies related to our wellness program or overall benefits program. We may need their expertise as