
COMMISSION AGENDA
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer
February 9, 2011
Page 2 of 3
as the Corps of Engineers, Navy, Coast Guard, King County, and the Washington State
Department of Transportation, and has been used successfully by the Port since 2009.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF WORK
IDIQ contracts will be procured according to the process detailed in CPO-1, which became
effective January 31, 2009. The contracts will be written with specific not-to-exceed amounts
and for a maximum of three years. The Port’s Office of Social Responsibility will assist in
identifying any small business opportunities prior to the time of public advertisement of the IDIQ.
One executed, individual Service Directives will be negotiated and processed before any work is
performed. Service Directives, consisting of a Scope, Fee Agreement and Schedule, will not be
established until the project has been approved in accordance with Resolution No. 3605.
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Each Service Directive will specify the schedule associated with the tasks involved. The contracts
themselves will be awarded for a maximum of three years.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Charges to these contracts will be from projects which have already been authorized within
established procedures. Consequently, there is no funding request associated with this authorization.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES:
This project supports the Port’s strategy to “Ensure Airport and Seaport Vitality” through
renewing and replacing vital seaport infrastructure to Port of Seattle waterfront operations.
Best management practices will be deployed in the selection of materials, work practices and
ongoing total cost of ownership.
BUSINESS PLAN OBJECTIVES
This project is aligned with the business plan objectives to maintain safe facilities and assets
while providing customers with compelling value.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS:
1. Prepare separate procurements each time Project Management services are needed. This option
would not be the most efficient use of Port resources, as it would result in multiple low dollar
contracts for similar services. This is not the recommended alternative.
2. Prepare one Category III procurement for each specialized service area. This alternative ensures a
competitive process, encourages small business participation, and provides staff with the tools