
COMMISSION AGENDA
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer
September 25, 2009
Page 2 of 3
Justifications:
1. The design for the Post Tension (PT) rebar was not provided in the table for the fifth
floor PT girders to be achieved with the PT strands. Without this information, the
layout and number of PT strands could not be identified. In addition, this change
also modifies the PT force and the rebar layout for a number of non-seismic beams
and girders. This modification is needed to conform to the load factor for buses and
fire trucks which will use the fifth floor.
2. The initial discussion on procurement for all electrical distribution equipment was to
have the Port of Seattle (POS) supply these pieces of equipment. Subsequently, the
POS made a decision to have the contractor provide items that were more readily
available, such as lower tier switch boards, transformers and panel boards. At bid,
the electrical package had notes and references that identified that the POS was to
procure all the equipment. Transferring procurement of this electrical equipment
from the POS to the contractor will eliminate the gap in the scope for the
procurement between the equipment purchased by the POS and the contract or bid
equipment. The contractor is now responsible for the procurement and delivery of
all electrical equipment, except for the main distribution and first tier equipment
480v switch boards.
3. The QTA drainage piping required coordination due to the added carwash equipment,
which resulted in higher drainage loads and the need for larger-sized pipe. Heat
tracing was not shown at the QTAs. The QTAs will be impacted by outside
temperatures and, during periods of extreme cold, could be subject to freezing.
4. The RCF roof framing modifications are based on design review comments from the
building department for the projected wind loading. HVAC supports and equipment
pads modifications are needed to coordinate the installation of the HVAC equipment
with the support structure.
5. The specification for roof coating was changed to add a reflectivity coating on top of
the roof. This LEED coating will decrease the temperature load on the building
from the summer sun and, therefore, decrease the cost of cooling the building.
Consequences of not proceeding:
1. The structure at the fifth floor would not be able to meet the structural loading
requirements of the building or adequately support the loading from buses and fire
trucks.
2. There is no lower tier equipment in any bid necessary for the facility to function
properly.
3. Without the QTA drainage piping size increase, there is the potential for ponding of
water at the drains that might overload the roof. The absence of heat tracing on the
chilled water piping could result in the pipes freezing in extreme cold weather.
4. Without the modifications to the wind loading schedule, there is the potential for the
roof and the skylight design not to perform during a wind event. Absent the