
COMMISSION AGENDA
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer
April 30, 2009
Page 3 of 4
interests were relatively small in the make-up of the participants. This led staff to assemble a
mail-back customized map/survey questionnaire for the businesses in the Duwamish study area,
substantially increasing participation. After the release of the first draft of the plan in October a
second project open house meeting was held in the Georgetown neighborhood on November 12.
The aggregate number of attendees to sign-in to one of the public meetings was approximately
120.
The outreach program relied heavily on email and the internet. A project email distribution list
was compiled from the outset and was very effective in updating interested parties on meetings
or plan development milestones. Staff also gained extra exposure when the Duwamish River
Cleanup Coalition forwarded our meeting notices to their extensive email list. A project website
has been maintained within the Port’s site throughout the plan development.
PLAN CONTENT
Staff are pleased to report that Duwamish business representatives have been, generally, very
receptive to having the plan designate habitat areas in proximity to their docks and other marine
infrastructure. As a result, the final plan identifies a total of 31 habitat project sites. The majority
of the sites are on ribbon properties, representing potential shoreline corridor enhancements
along the Duwamish Waterway, improvements which would also be beneficial to adjacent
aquatic life in the river. In addition, several potential restoration sites include existing upland
areas where previously placed fill material could be removed to create substantial new inter-tidal,
shoreline, and riparian resource values. These larger restoration sites are a unique opportunity to
provide space, cover, and nutrition to resident and migratory fish and wildlife.
The layout of the plan’s 31 habitat sites represents an opportunity to restore important
environmental resources throughout the Duwamish Waterway, providing continuity of habitat
enhancement across the 4.6 miles of the study corridor. Identifying potential habitat restoration
actions in shoreline areas fronting non-water-dependent businesses is straightforward, in contrast
to facilities that require connections between upland areas and the navigation channel for the
purpose of cargo/materials transshipment. An early concern identified during workshop activities
was a gap in habitat restoration potential between river miles 2.0 and 3.0, because of the density
of water-dependent businesses in this area. Nevertheless, in working with business owners,
several opportunities for habitat restoration were identified in proximity to existing marine
facilities. In some cases existing businesses were supportive of restoration actions described
directly adjacent to and landward of their mooring dolphins. This corresponds to a situation
where the access to the vessel berth is water-side only.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
Because the Lower Duwamish River Habitat Restoration Plan is a policy document, its adoption
is accompanied by a programmatic environmental review pursuant to the State Environmental