
failed, to retrofit and upgrade truck fleets through lease and loan programs with
individual drivers.' Under even the best economic conditions, individual drivers are
unable to bear the costs of leasing and maintaining replacement trucks. Although these
drivers are classified as
"
independent contractors,
"
trucking company workers lack the
negotiating rights to pass the costs of clean trucks on to the
trucking companies, the
shippers, or the
buyers.* The proposed plan will force drivers to choose between taking
on substantial additional debt and losing their jobs.
In
the end, this plan may encourage
drivers to simply take their polluting vehicles into other Northwest port communities
such as Everett, Tacoma, and Portland.
The Port of Seattle Commission needs to have all of the information before it votes
to authorize funds or action.
Before committing funds or authorizing action, we urge the Port of Seattle Commission
to direct port staff to:
1)
Present a range of genuine alternatives:
Port staff are offering the Commission
only one plan to accept or reject instead of offering a range of possible models to
meet the clean air goals.
2)
Conduct an independent analysis of the impacts of the top truck plan
alternatives:
Like the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach and Oakland, the Port of
Seattle should commission an independent analysis of the environmental, community
and economic impacts of alternative clean truck plans before committing further
public and private resources. With more than 18 months before the December 2010
deadline, we believe there is enough time to conduct a thorough and thoughtful
analysis of a range of alternatives.
3) Fully analyze and present the plans details:
Before authorizing action or funds,
Port Commission should require staff to fully document exactly how the plan to meet
the 20 10 standards will address these important components:
Scrapping: Ensure that scrapped trucks are truly removed and do not appear in
other markets or communities.
Registry: Demonstrate how a truck registry or licensing system will work and will
enable efficient
tracking and enforcement of the truck ban at the terminal gates.
Enforcement: Ensure terminal operators will enforce and document the truck ban
at the gates in a fair and consistent manner, and allow for adaptive management in
the face of new requirements. Port staff must provide adequate public review of
'
Approximately
35
individual drivers have enrolled in a similar program at the Port of Long Beach to
date, and less than a dozen signed up for the Virginia Port Authority's retrofit program.
2
Trucking companies, in comparison, are much better qualified to manage and maintain retrofit trucks.
Trucking companies have better access to credit, can pass costs on to shippers and buyers, are able to
reallocate resources, and are better able to manage risk and fluctuating cargo volumes. Trucking
companies will ultimately be more responsive to the maintenance requirements of retrofit engines and are
less likely to default or violate the terms of a retrofit truck lease or contract.