
Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Eastside Corridor crossing 1
-
90 south of downtown Bellevue
Feasibility
study
assumptions
estimates include broad assuniptions for track and trackbed, rail
The feasibility study builds on previous studies of passenger or
commuter rail on the corridor and used the following general
assumptions:
Upgrades were identified and costs were estimated at permanent
passenger rail infrastructure standards including full replacement
of the track, ties and rail bed (a demonstration project or project
implemented by private entities could be accomplished differently
with potentially lower costs)
Either diesel locomotives with bi
-
level coaches (Sounder
-
type
vehicles) or diesel multiple units
(DMUs) could be used
Complete signal/communication for train detection and control
along with centralized train control were provided
bridges,
signalsltrain control/crossings, stations and right
-
of
-
way;
and soft costs such as administration, design and environmental
review and construction management. The cost estimates include
significant contingencies based on the conceptual level of analysis.
It
is
possible that passenger rail could be implemented in a different
manner with a possible lower cost, but the costs in this report were
estimated using methods developed by Sound Transit for its Sound
Transit
2
Plan and approved by an independent review panel.
Operating
costs
Operating costs are estimated at $24 to $32 million per year based
on two
-
way service on the corridor with trains operating every 30
minutes in each direction, 16 hours per day weekdays, along with
track and vehicle maintenance costs.
All public and private grade crossings were upgraded
Sound Transit
2
No new grade
-
separated crossings were included
The condition of all 24 existing bridges was not evaluated
One small yard and shops facility is needed
The train speed, including stops, would average 24 mph
Service would run two ways for 16 hours a day on weekdays. Trains
would run every 30 minutes.
The study did not identify an optimal solution, preferred alternative,
or the lowest cost or most cost
-
effective option. That information
would be developed in the future by an agency or group proposing
passenger rail on the corridor.
Sound Transit 2, the mass transit package approved by voters in
November 2008, includes a $50 million capital contribution to a
potential passenger rail partnership.
If
a partnership is not in place
by the end of 201 1, the funds will be re
-
directed to HOV/bus rapid
transit in the 1
-
405 corridor. Sound Transit 2 does not include any
additional funds for commuter or passenger rail on the
Eastside
BNSF corridor. For more information about the Sound Transit
2
Plan
and requirements related to the $50 million capital contribution,
please refer to the Sound Transit Web site at: http://future.
soundtransit.org/documents/ST2~Plan~web.pdf.
Capital
Casts
1
The capital costs for passenger rail on the entire corridor are
r
SOUND TRANS^^
RIDE
THE
WAVE
estimated at $1.0 to $1.3 billion (in 20089). The capital cost